Note Review: Process Interrelation Session (2026-03-22)
Note Review: Process Interrelation Session (2026-03-22)
Source: note-process-interrelation-session.md Reviewed: 2026-03-22 Method: Interactive review via /toolkit:note-review
Context
CEO session on 2026-03-21 via Claude web app. The board identified that all 21 factory roles have defined inputs/outputs but no cross-departmental process orchestration — roles don't know who to notify after completing work. Oscar executed a 4-phase plan (map → design pattern → implement → validate) and also built the full CI system (TFD-0008), closing 4 backlog items. The work was done in a single mobile session.
Key Observations
- Oscar executed the full 4-phase plan in one session — process interaction map, notification standard (28 notification IDs), 18 role updates, and a decision record all committed
- CI system was also built end-to-end (TFD-0008) —
/cicommand, 6-stage pipeline, 4 backlog items closed (CI-0001, CI-0005, CI-0007, CI-0010) - Key lesson learned captured: without explicit notification obligations, the board becomes the manual router — this doesn't scale
Decisions
D1 — Validate the phone session work · Critical
Stakes: A large amount of work was done in the Claude web app — need to confirm artifacts exist and are consistent in the repo.
Options considered:
- A: Yes, verify now
- B: Trust but verify later
- C: Already checked
Decision: Yes, verify now — check that all claimed artifacts (TFD-0007, process map, notification standard, role updates, CI system) exist and are consistent.
D2 — Marcel's expanded designation · Critical
Stakes: Marcel was told "you are the document specialist from the board of directors" during the session. Need to determine if this is a role update or session context.
Options considered:
- A: Update Marcel's role — officially the board's document specialist
- B: Session context only — Marcel stays as Methodology Specialist
- C: Clarify later
Decision: Marcel should document internal processes and inter-relations. He should also be able to identify gaps. Role.md needs to be checked and potentially updated to reflect this expanded responsibility.
D3 — 8 remaining backlog items · Important
Stakes: CI-0002, CI-0003, CI-0004, CI-0006, CI-0008, CI-0009, CI-0011, CI-0012 still open.
Options considered:
- A: Prioritize now
- B: Focus on validation first
- C: Defer
Decision: Focus on validation first — verify yesterday's work is solid before starting new items.
Questions Clarified
Q1 — Quinn regression status · Important
Has Quinn run regression to verify the 18 updated roles still score well?
Answer: Not sure — needs to be checked as part of validation.
Q2 — TFD-0007 naming conflict · Important
The session mentions creating TFD-0007 for the process interaction map, but TFD-0007 in the repo is 'web-team-consolidation.md'. Was TFD-0007 overwritten or is there a numbering conflict?
Answer: Check for me — investigate during validation.
Actions
| # | Action | Owner | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Verify all claimed artifacts from phone session exist in repo | Current session | Critical |
| A2 | Check TFD-0007 numbering conflict | Current session | Critical |
| A3 | Run Quinn regression on updated roles | Quinn | Important |
| A4 | Review Marcel's role.md — expand to include process documentation and gap identification | Marcel/CEO | Important |
| A5 | Tackle remaining 8 backlog items after validation passes | Various | Medium |
Suggested Next Step
Validate the phone session artifacts immediately (A1, A2), then run regression (A3) and review Marcel's role (A4).